National Health Accounts figures indicate high burden of health care costs on people
What does this development mean for UPSC preparation?
UPSC CSE Context Why in News: National Health Accounts 2022 23 shows out of pocket expenditure remains nearly half of current health expenditure. Syllabus Connection: GS Paper 2: Social Justice – Health; GS Paper 3: Inclusive Growth; GS Paper 1: Society – Health indicators. Exam Relevance: Highlights persistent gaps in
UPSC CSE Context
Why in News: National Health Accounts 2022-23 shows out-of-pocket expenditure remains nearly half of current health expenditure.
Syllabus Connection: GS Paper 2: Social Justice – Health; GS Paper 3: Inclusive Growth; GS Paper 1: Society – Health indicators.
Exam Relevance: Highlights persistent gaps in public health financing, privatisation, and financial protection – key for Mains and Prelims.
Core Issue
High out-of-pocket health expenditure despite increased government spending.
Key Development: Government Health Expenditure share in GDP rose to 1.43% but remains below NHP target of 2.5%.
Stakeholders:
- Households
- Government (Centre & States)
- Private hospitals
- Insurance companies
- Jan Swasthya Abhiyan
Static Knowledge
High-Value Background:
- National Health Accounts (NHA) estimate health expenditure flows in India annually.
Exam Linkage:
- Useful for questions on health financing, universal health coverage, and public-private mix.
Concepts in Context:
- Current Health Expenditure (CHE) excludes capital expenditure, measures final consumption.
- Government-financed health insurance includes PMJAY and state schemes.
Institutions and Mechanisms:
- National Health Accounts prepared by National Health Systems Resource Centre (NHSRC).
- Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (PMJAY) – flagship public health insurance.
Dynamic Analysis
Governance
- Public health spending at 1.43% of GDP is far below WHO recommendation of 5% and NHP target of 2.5%.
- COVID-era surge in public spending was not sustained; GHE share in CHE dropped from 41.1% to 35.6% in one year.
- State governments bear over 63% of government health expenditure, indicating fiscal strain on states.
- Low spending on preventive care (8.88% of CHE) reflects reactive rather than proactive health policy.
Economy
- Private health insurance (9.2% of THE) is three times government-financed insurance (3%), indicating low public coverage.
- High OOPE pushes families into poverty and reduces access to healthcare.
Society
- Unregulated privatisation leads to inequities in access, rising costs, and irrational treatment.
- Non-communicable diseases cause 60% of deaths, yet preventive care spending is low.
- Financial protection remains incomplete despite insurance schemes, especially for poor and vulnerable.
Prelims Takeaways
- National Health Accounts 2022-23: OOPE is 49.9% of Current Health Expenditure.
- Government Health Expenditure as % of GDP: 1.43% (2022-23).
Mains Value Addition
Arguments:
- Increased public spending alone insufficient without addressing privatisation and insurance gaps.
- Low preventive care spending undermines long-term health outcomes and increases curative costs.
- State-dominated health expenditure without adequate central transfers strains state finances.
- Private insurance growth without regulation can exacerbate inequities.
Examples:
- PMJAY covers only 3% of total health expenditure, showing limited financial protection.
Counterpoints:
- Government claims increased prioritisation; GHE per capita rose 2.7 times in a decade.
- Insurance schemes may reduce OOPE for some but overall burden remains high.
Way Forward
- Increase public health spending to at least 2.5% of GDP as per NHP 2017.
- Strengthen primary and preventive care to reduce curative burden and NCDs.
- Regulate private healthcare costs and ensure transparency in treatment pricing.
- Expand government-financed insurance coverage and reduce reliance on private insurance.
- Enhance central fiscal transfers for health to ease state burden.
How should an aspirant use this analysis?
Connect the development to the relevant syllabus phrase, distinguish verified facts from interpretation, and use the cited source to confirm time-sensitive details. For Mains, frame the issue through stakeholders, constitutional or institutional context, implementation constraints and a balanced way forward. For Prelims, extract only testable terms, bodies, provisions, locations and cause-effect relationships.