Keep ST classification free of ‘political manipulation’, raise quota, demands Left-affiliated tribal body

Published 2026-09-07 · Updated 2026-09-07 · 3 min · 563 words

UPSC CSE Context

Why in News

AARM national convention passed a charter of demands on ST rights, including review of classification criteria and increased reservation.

Syllabus Connection

GS Paper 2: Social Justice, Welfare Schemes for Vulnerable Sections; GS Paper 1: Indian Society; GS Paper 3: Inclusive Growth.

Exam Relevance

High relevance for UPSC CSE Mains due to ongoing debates on ST reservation, classification criteria, and tribal rights; useful for answer writing on social justice and governance.

Core Issue

AARM demands ST reservation increase and classification criteria review.

Key Development

AARM opposed religion-based ST delisting and demanded review of outdated Lokur Committee criteria.

Stakeholders

• Adivasi Adhikar Rashtriya Manch (AARM)
• Scheduled Tribe communities
• BJP and RSS
• Janjati Suraksha Manch
• Akhil Bharatiya Vanvasi Kalyan Ashram
• CPI(M)

Static Knowledge

High-Value Background

• Lokur Committee (1965) set criteria for ST identification, including primitive traits, distinctive culture, geographical isolation, shyness of contact, and backwardness.
• ST reservation is 7.5% in central government jobs and education, though ST population is 8.6% (2011 Census).

Exam Linkage

• Useful for questions on affirmative action, tribal rights, and constitutional safeguards for Scheduled Tribes.

Concepts in Context

• Fifth Schedule provides for administration and control of Scheduled Areas and Scheduled Tribes in 10 states.
• PESA Act, 1996 extends Panchayat provisions to Scheduled Areas, empowering gram sabhas.

Institutions and Mechanisms

• National Commission for Scheduled Tribes (NCST) monitors safeguards for STs.
• Ministry of Tribal Affairs is the nodal ministry for tribal welfare.

Dynamic Analysis

Social Justice

• Demand to increase ST reservation to population proportion highlights gap between legal entitlement and demographic reality.
• Opposition to religion-based delisting protects secular nature of affirmative action.
• Review of outdated criteria like 'shyness of contact' may make classification more inclusive.
• Concern over non-Adivasis obtaining ST certificates reflects risk of dilution of benefits.

Governance

• Time-bound review of rejected FRA claims addresses implementation gaps in forest rights.
• Empowering gram sabhas aligns with PESA's decentralisation intent.
• Scrapping state task forces outside statutory ambit checks executive overreach.
• Freezing forest evictions protects habitat rights of tribals.

Federalism

• Demand to expand Fifth Schedule areas involves Centre-state coordination.
• State governments' role in issuing ST certificates raises concerns about political manipulation.
• Uniform criteria review may require consensus among states with tribal populations.

Economy

• Reservation in private sector is a contentious demand with implications for labour market.
• Filling backlog vacancies addresses unemployment among STs.
• Increased budgetary allocation for education in tribal regions targets human capital development.

Mains Value Addition

Arguments

• Reservation percentage should be aligned with current population data to ensure equitable representation.
• Classification criteria must be periodically reviewed to remove obsolete conditions without introducing religion-based exclusions.
• Strengthening FRA implementation and gram sabha empowerment is essential for tribal self-governance.
• Private sector reservation may be necessary to address employment gaps but requires careful design to avoid economic distortions.

Examples

• AARM's demand to include Adivasi languages in Eighth Schedule reflects cultural preservation needs.

Data Points

• ST population: 8.6% (2011 Census); ST reservation: 7.5%.
• Lokur Committee established in 1965.

Counterpoints

• Religion-based delisting demanded by Sangh Parivar outfits could exclude converted tribals from benefits.
• Increasing reservation may face legal challenges regarding 50% ceiling set by Supreme Court.

Way Forward

• Constitute an expert committee to review ST classification criteria, excluding religion as a factor.
• Increase ST reservation proportionately after 2027 Census data is available.
• Strengthen monitoring mechanisms to prevent fraudulent ST certificate issuance.
• Enhance budgetary allocation for tribal education and ensure mother tongue instruction.

Primary/reference source: thehindu.com